He who fights and runs away....

... lives to fight another day. At least that seems to be the message from the Mount, that is, Mount Moscow, Idaho, where our intrepid wordmeister, Douglas the Greater, has managed to score a TKO against a prissy lefty while starting another catfight among the Auburn Avenue combatants. At least that is one possible interpretation among many.

Yes, while dancing like a butterfly and stinging like a bee, the Great One has managed to position himself on both sides of his "Stalinist" opponent, while throwing his erstwhile Christian brethren out like Lot's daughters. The fabled Confederate flag that once hung in his office was really a dust cover for a computer keyboard. Poor Joe Morecraft was mistaken in his tattling letter to the local newspaper editor! It is now long gone, but not his portraits of Stonewall Jackson and Jeb Stuart! He throws down the gauntlet!

When our clamoring multiculturalists want me to back away from the facts, I want to do my best imitation of Stonewall at First Manassas. But I feel bad for those fellow Christians, like Joe, and Terry, and Cal, and others, who are willing to retreat from their basic covenant loyalties on the basis of whatever their own petty issues are.

Now there is the man who counseled "owning the curse" at his fiery finest. The man who tap danced like Gregory Hines on speed when debated by one of the local eunuchs about his desire to transform Moscow into the image of Christ Church (which Wilson, of course, denied). So much for the dominion mandate. (The audio of the debate is posted here.)

But, as DW might say, that is ancient history. Just like this, posted a month ago:

Lee's portrait displayed where? Proudly displayed where? What was the context? Did he want us to teach the American Civil War with certain key figures whited out? "And when umphy humphy made the fateful decision to move toward Gettysburg . . ."

Well, Doug isn't so proud of Lee as he is of Stonewall and Jeb. Or are we missing something here? Splitting hairs is Wilson's specialty, as opposed to the courser grindings of the Gris Mill.

I honestly don't know a whole lot about him, but Wikipedia says that he wants to boycott Tommy Hilfiger for incorporating confederate insignia into their clothing lines. And that would be bad, admittedly, were it actually being done. What I would give to have been at the TOMMY board meeting where that decision was made!

Bad for whom? Is Herr Wilson worried that the flag will be demeaned by this, or Tommy Hilfiger?

We frankly admit lacking the "higher mind" required for initiation into the Wilsonian Mysteries. He could tie even ole' Maimonides in knots with some of his reasoning. (And I like the name RaMBaM. Maybe we'll start referring to Douger as DaMWaM.)

At least we're glad that all this isn't a "retreat from ... basic covenant loyalties." To see DaMWaM do that would really be something.

You better not pout, you better not deny...

...you better not advertise for a normal Santa Claus, at least if you work for mall operator Hull Storey Retail Group.

The Orangeburg, SC mall manager sent out a flier looking for a jolly ole stand-in for St. Nick:

It identified the basic qualifications as “hygienically clean; preferably Caucasian; jolly — enjoys being with children; natural beard a plus, but not necessary; okay to carry a few extra pounds! We’ll even provide extra milk and cookies as a bonus!”The flier raised the immediate ire of some mall tenants.

Travis Griffin, who has leased a cell phone kiosk at the mall for about a year, said the flier is a “slap in the face” for all African-Americans who both work and shop at the mall. “This has drawn the line,” he said.

The Augusta, Ga.-based mall owner Hull Storey Retail Group received the flier via fax Thursday evening and upon receipt terminated the manager immediately, said John Gibson, Hull Storey president and chief executive officer.

“We called the mall manager and she confirmed to us at that time that she in fact had written this,” Gibson said. “This is completely contrary to our policies, to my personal beliefs and, I would hope, the values of the people in our company.”

It is not exactly clear from the article what the African American kiosk operator was objecting to. "Hygienically clean" certainly smacks of white, Western bias. Preference for someone "jolly" would seem to rub him the wrong way as well, judging from his apparently curmudgeonly disposition. Blacks tend to have skin problems making shaving difficult, and allegedly love women "with big back," so we can rule out the beard and cookies as issues. Unless, of course, there was no consideration given to minority contractor set-asides for the cookie vending.

Judging by the immediate belly crawl of the CEO, he has to be a white man, so we must dig deeper for an explanation. You have to hand it to the company though. How many companies are thorough enough to outline Santa hiring polices in the company manual? The foolish store manager. She should have been paying more attention.

Editor's note: Just where would blogging be today if all posts were as mind-numbingly banal as those of the race-deniers. We apologize to anyone on the downhill slope of the bell-curve for this exercise in tenditious silliness.

The Sleeping Sheep are Stirring...

... according to the "Fox"man, Abe Foxman of the ADL. ADL's Foxman warns of efforts to 'Christianize America' says the article in Haaretz. The responses are quite interesting, and one from a "Paul" draws the obvious parallel:

All the classic themes of anti-Semitic slurs -- the Jews are trying to take over the world, their ultimate goal is murder and tyranny, they hate us -- are sounded in Foxman`s critique of Christianity, just with the labels changed.

To Foxman`s credit, he at least acknowledges that "Christian extremists" are only interested in politics because they want to defend themselves against the aggression of the secular left, who are trying to turn Christians into second-class citizens by prohibiting them from participating in public life. It`s too bad Foxman`s response to those fears is to prove them true -- by seeking the prohibition of Christian participation in public life!

Of course, the elephant in the living room is this "secular left," isn't it? It is interesting that ole Abe acknowledges the perfectly sensible reasons why Christians are reacting to the advances of his tribe, without trying to refute them. "Don't the dumb goyim know their place!" one can almost hear him yelling at his henchmensch.

It has been so long since any of the "Christian" groups Abe mentions have even imagined holding him or his kinsmen to account for anything, that poor Abe can't imagine having to actually refute them!

Poor dear! Hopefully a good bowl of chicken noodle soup and a couple of gay porn films will make it all better.

No Child Left Behind

The mania among so-called "conservative" Protestant churches to promote inter-racial marriage and adoption should be seen for what it is. A sign of the "mark of the beast" of Revelation.

Doesn't it mention something about no one being able to buy or sell unless they have the mark? Well, when someone in your church marries or adopts a non-white, aren't you expected to accept that person without reserve? It is nothing less than an aggressive act of force.

If you don't like it, you will be "churched" or called before the "elders" for a good arse-chewing, at the very least. You will be the bad guy. You will be the "intolerant" one. You will be the one sowing discord.

You must take the mark. You must accept it, and forever alter the way you act and see the world. It is no different than the sodomite "rights" gambit. They just want to be "equal". But where does it stop? It cannot stop until you have "owned the whole curse" so to speak. You complain about advertisements showing gay couples? How dare you! Complain about queer "PDA"? Hateful bigot. They know the game. It is aggressive.

So now you must accept the non-white as just like your child. Your children must accept them, and never see a difference.

What is the difference here?

Lefties get it Right

Check out this powerful flash animation on the war in Iraq and the lying "leaders" who brought it about.

Living the Dream

Mike Bradley makes an incisive observation regarding Doug Wilson and his hit and run attacks on Little Geneva and the kinists:

We know what’s driving his crusade against kinism and leading him to come up with these laughable interpretations. He’s between a real rock and a hard place. He dare not concede that kinists are right or that’s probably all she wrote for Wilson Industries.

Spot on, indeed. You see, Wilson is "Living the Dream," which is becoming more of a living nightmare every day. The train is rolling faster and faster down that hill, and there is no way to keep one foot on the platform. You are either on the train, or you have your feet planted on solid ground.

When you cut through all the shouting, there is a simple principle that defines the so-called "Civil Rights" movement. "Regardless of our behavior, you must treat us as equals!" The windy rhetoric aside, this little hole in the levee has led to the nationwide New Orleans unfolding right before our eyes.

The "Dream" is a direct attack on the law, destroying all order and value, in the name of a chimerical "equality" which is nothing less than hell on earth. It is enmity with God.

This is why Wilson and his cronies must juke and jive and prevaricate. One cannot support "The Dream" and the Gospel; no man can serve two masters. The kinists are standing firm, and from this stable platform are putting the flittering flightiness of the Rainbow Reformers in stark contrast.

It is very likely that Doug and company are so deracinated and atomized that they can't see the forest for the trees. Maybe they cannot imagine anything beyond the giant abstraction called "America." Of course, they also know that they can't let anyone get off the merry-go-round, or the fun stops.

Go OJ Go!

The other day we heard a radio talking head describing the recent Frontline program about the OJ Simpson trial. He said it was one of the most interesting programs he had seen in years.

The premise of the show was how the two races saw the whole trial, and why blacks reacted as they did. He said that basically, the cops framed a guilty man, and that all the blacks interviewed, dozens of "scholars" as he called them, as well as TABMITS (The Average Black Man in the Streets to modify an old marketing phrase), believed OJ was guilty, but were just happy that one of their own was finally a beneficiary of the crooked system that whites get around all the time.

He seemed to think blacks were completely justified in this response, and said that the real star of the whole affair was Johnny Cochrane (who may now have a different opinion about the righteousness of getting a murderer off the hook with nothing but hot air than he did while he was walking this earth. But we digress....), who worked the case "brilliantly."

Anyone with a pulse who paid the least bit of attention to the trial ten years ago could see that the prosecution bent over backwards to lose that case. LA's "leaders" didn't want any more riots, so they made sure there weren't any. Only the Republican effort to not impeach Clinton at all costs while appearing to try looked even phonier.

Why else would the prosecution team consist of an incompetent Jewish woman with a male Negro step-and-fetchit sidekick, in front of a largely black and female jury? Only a Doug Wilson essay explaining this strategy in a minimalist literary journal would look more out of place.

And let's don't even go to the low-speed made-for-TV car chase coincidentally in the middle of an NBA finals game that got the whole thing started.

The issue of cops planting evidence is always disturbing, especially as the drive for "hate" crime laws goes into high gear. But once again, the unspoken story speaks loudly.

If most blacks are happy to see our justice system corrupted because "they" got away with it this time, doesn't that prove yet once again that we must go our separate ways?